climategate

Video Podcast – Episode Three: Exposing the War on Life, Liberty, Property

We are witnessing the clash of two competing philosophies. The older of the two brought forth the emancipating concept of life, liberty and happiness, while the younger ethos has delivered great tribulation to the world. As you will discover in this intriguing, well-produced podcast, the latter philosophy has cleverly made the climate agenda its centerpiece and is patiently using it as a tool do undo America.

Watch it on my Youtube channel (@briansussmanshow): https://youtu.be/QMwC0bOO0uU?si=WnTMzscVWHFRpZPT

 

Lies and Fear: Global Boiling

The Secretary-General of the United Nations is claiming we have entered, “The era of global boiling.” The Washington Post says this is the hottest weather in “thousands of years.”

It’s a lie.

Here’s the truth: NASA satellite data indicate that July 2023 was the warmest July in the satellite record, but that record only dates back to 1979 and there certainly were Julys before 1979.

This kind of messaging is part of a blatant scare campaign representative of a comprehensive, compulsory indoctrination program being employed via all popular communication mediums and in virtually every school in the developed world. It doesn’t matter how many predictions of doom fail to manifest, the false prophets spouting these lies are never held accountable.

This rhetoric is often referred to as brainwashing, greenwashing, or even mind control; psychologists refer to these methods of coercion as “fear appeals.”  Unprecedented pressure is being placed upon the masses to dogmatically believe that humanity is on the brink because of lifestyle choices dependent on energy derived from fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide, once taught to be life’s essential ally, is now the enemy. Our planet’s history of fluctuating temperatures has been blotted-out and replaced with sensationalized graphs that spike upward in the present like a red-hot skewer. Alternative deliberation is not tolerated.

Climate Change Agenda is “shock-journalistic pseudoscience,” says Nobel Physicist

Dr. John F. Clauser, joint recipient of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, has criticized the climate emergency narrative, calling it “a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.”

Clauser has criticized the awarding of the 2021 Nobel Prize for work in the development of computer models predicting global warming, according to a coalition of scientists and commentators who argue that an informed discussion about CO2 would recognize its importance in sustaining plant life. 

According to a statement by Dr. Clauser posted at CO2Coalition.org, “The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience. In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis. There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”

Dr. Clauser received a Bachelor of Science in physics in 1964 from Caltech. In 1966, he earned a Master of Arts in physics as well as a Doctor of Philosophy in 1969 from Columbia University. From 1969 to 1996 he worked at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley. He was awarded the Wolf Prize in Physics in 2010. Additional details can be found at https://www.johnclauser.com/.

Faith in Climate Models is Foolish

One-point-five-degrees.

That’s the atmospheric warming threshold—the tipping point—that the public has been led to believe must be avoided at all costs. The climate catechism contends since the last Ice Age, some 12,000 years ago, the planet was naturally unthawing just fine until humans discovered the energy available through the use of fossil fuels and capitalists, exploiting labor, launched the Industrial Revolution.  Billions of humans later—with their countless polluting cars, trucks, buses, trains, planes—the temperature has risen 1.2o Celsius, and it’s soon to hit the danger mark of 1.5o if we don’t quickly conform to Net Zero.

If that doesn’t work, more drastic measures must be considered because all of the experts with their computer models say so. And trust me, drastic measures are being designed by both governments and billionaires.

But, taking a step back, let’s imagine a conversation with your average climate change believer.

You ask,“If we’ve already reached warming worth 1.2 o C, what’s another point-3-degrees going to look like? Will we even notice the difference in average temperature?”

The climate disciple will immediately go to Google and then respond, “The planet is currently experiencing some of the warmest weather on record.”

“And what about the recent record cold temperatures?”

Feeling it unnecessary to engage their phone, they quickly answer, “There are none.”

“Really? Last winter the summit of Mount Washington, New Hampshire reported a wind-chill of minus 78 Celsius (-108 Fahrenheit) — the coldest temperature ever recorded in the United States. California had its firth coldest March since 1885.”

“That’s not the world, that’s the United States.”

“You’re correct. How ‘bout this? In 2021, the average temperature at the South Pole between their winter months of April and September, was minus-78 degrees Fahrenheit (minus-61 Celsius), the coldest on record;  The extreme cold pushed sea ice levels surrounding the Antarctica to their one of their highest levels on record.”

“Fake news.”

“No. It’s real info from the United States Antarctic Program administered by the National Science Foundation, and the National Snow and Ice Data Center.”

“Meh,” the person shrugs, flipping to their TokTok feed.

And as for those climate models?  There’s a big problem.

Clouds associated with thunderstorms play a major role in the climate cycle, as they reflect the sun’s energy back into space and also trap the heat that rises from the surface; but climate models cannot accurately account for thunderstorms, nor clouds, or even water vapor. Additionally, the models are unable to replicate the actions produced powerful ocean currents which are essentially massive weather conveyor belts.  Weather patterns are driven by these currents, which are created by a combination of surface winds, water temperature and salinity gradients, Earth’s rotation, and the gravitational effects of the sun and moon which create the tides.  These magnificent ocean currents transport warm water and precipitation from the equator toward the poles and cold water from the poles back to the tropics, regulating the global climate and counteracting the uneven distribution of solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface.

The models can’t handle these features.

So, what do the climate modelers do when they just don’t know?

They approximate.

And what they can’t approximate they omit.

Perhaps this is why the models have a dismal track record. Apart from failing to predict a pause in global warming in the early 2000s, the models are known even by modelers to consistently run hot.

Could it be human bias and political agenda weighs in to the estimations made by certain modelers?

Joe’s Polluting Motorcade

Our green President, Joe Biden, caused a massive traffic backup on the Capital Beltway, leaving hundreds of stagnant drivers, including some of his supporters, fuming last week.

Biden and his motorcade were driving to a fundraiser in Maryland, and sections of I-495 were cordoned off to make way.

The lane closures came during the evening rush hour, and wreaked havoc on commuters. Traffic became stagnant for hours , causing backups more than five miles long.  That’s a lot of carbon dioxide from those evil combustion engine cars, which climate activists claim is causing massive global warming and setting the earth on fire.  This is especially ironic considering the Biden Administration’s super aggressive stance on climate change.

To calculate a rough estimate of just how much CO2 Biden’s traffic jam might have unleashed into the environment, the Media Research Center reached out to environmental and public health consultant Steve Milloy, founder and publisher of JunkScience.com.

An idling car burns half a gallon of gasoline per hour, which produces ten pounds of carbon dioxide, Milloy explained. Hypothetically, Milloy calculated, if 1,000 cars had idled for an hour, they would have produced roughly five tons of carbon dioxide – the average amount of CO2 emitted by a single car in an entire year.