climate cult

Too Hot, Too Fast? Reviewing the Facts…

According to a recent article in the New York Times:

The world is getting hotter, faster. A report published last week found that human-caused global warming is now increasing…

The article, entitled, The World is Warming Up. And It’s Happening Fast, is nothing more than another desperate attempt by lame leftist influencers who are trying to frighten the uniformed into further submission. In fact, as I reveal in my most recent book, Climate Cult: Exposing and Defeating Their War on Life, Liberty, and Property, promoting unfounded fear has always been the primary strategy of socialists and communists.

Thankfully, the Trump administration, the Republican Party, and the MAGA movement at large is having nothing to do with it.

Nonetheless, we need to be on guard and ready to defend our position.

The “getting hotter, faster” mantra is based upon an unfounded doctrine that the world is fast approaching a temperature threshold that has never been crossed before. However, as I illustrate in Climate Cult, that prediction is total bunk. My conclusion is based on facts, not fiction. Boosting my confidence is a man who has provided us with the most prolific voice to swim upstream from the global warming gobbledygook. His name is John Clauser, and he is no slacker.

In fact, Dr. Clauser was the 2022 Nobel Prize recipient for physics.

While writing Climate Cult, Clauser joined another Nobel laureate and over 1,600 professionals in signing the World Climate Declaration (WCD) organized by Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL).  This powerful declaration asserts that there is no “climate emergency,” that climate change science is not conclusive, and that the earth’s history over thousands of years shows a consistently changing climate.

As I share in Climate Cult, Clauser states:

“I read all of the various [United Nations’ International Panel on Climate Change] reports [and the] National Academy reports on this.  As a physicist, I’d worked at some excellent institutions — Caltech, Columbia, Cal Berkeley — where very careful science needed to be done.  And reading these reports, I was appalled at how sloppy the work was.  And in particular, it was very obvious, even in the earliest reports, and all carried on through to the present, that clouds were not at all understood.…It’s just simply bad science.”

Focusing on the inherent weaknesses of the climate models used to forecast supposed climate change, Clauser continues, “I believe I have the missing piece of the puzzle that has been left out in virtually all of these computer programs.  And that is the effect of clouds.”

Clauser contends such modeling presents something akin to fiction. “That’s a totally artificial Earth.  It is a totally artificial case for using a model, and this is pretty much what the IPCC and others use — a cloud-free earth.”

Friends, a “cloud-free earth” may well be the biggest scientific scam in history!

Can you believe it? These computer models, that supposedly predict the end of the world, are not just incapable of replicating cloud cover in their various illustrations but they’re unable to predict the effects that clouds have in relationship to temperature.

As I contend in Climate Cult:

This is a huge win for climate truth, which the propagandists suppress from their congregants.  Such blatant censorship is emblematic of a cult, intended to perpetuate a continual state of fear, which is needed to keep the masses moving in the proper direction and allow the climate change high priests to continue their indoctrination of humanity.

I encourage you to arm yourself with the truth and pick up a copy of Climate Cult right away. And thanks.

ChemTrails and Climate Modification: Fact or Fiction?

Are chemicals purposefully being dispersed into the earth’s upper atmosphere in an effort to prevent the climate from supposedly being artificially altered by the use of fossil fuels, livestock waste, and other byproducts of modern living?

My most recent book, Climate Cult, is said to possess the most thorough, easy to understand, yet concise overview of chemtrails and geoengineering (intentional weather modification) ever presented. In my latest podcast (seen on Rumble, or heard on most audio podcasting platforms), I take the time to read Climate Cult’s ninth chapter, entitled, “Weather Gods.” In the chapter, I first poke poignant holes in the phony 1.5 degree warming threshold the climate cult’s leaders swear we are about to obliterate due to the release of carbon dioxide stemming from the use of fossil fuels.

I then present the entire history of weather modification, beginning with innocent experiments designed to de-ice US military aircraft during WWII, and continuing to the extensive and costly research being conducted at institutions such as Harvard, MIT, and University of Chicago to modify the earth’s climate through the creation of clouds in the stratosphere (a region of the earth’s atmosphere that naturally does not have clouds or weather of any significant sort).

This part of my book reveals that geoengineering is a loaded with unease. Bad actors across the globe could create unrelenting waves of devastating weather on an enemy, much like carrying out a prolonged military bombing raid at a fraction of the cost.

Just as disturbing is the fact that no one is honest about any actual experiments that have been conducted with aerosols in the stratosphere without the knowledge or approval of the citizens of the countries where such experiments are taking place. Would any reasonable person, when presented with the facts, believe that hundreds of scientists are spending their entire careers only on running computer simulations of stratospheric spraying?

I highly doubt it.

The challenges of governing such atmospheric capabilities are immense. A single government or cabal of governments, such as the United Nations, as well as wealthy individuals operating in the shadows of all governments, could carry out solar geoengineering, and every nation would be affected. Given the propensity for evil and lust for power among the elite, it is absolutely possible. How might these artificial alterations of weather patterns stunt plant photosynthesis, compromise wildlife habitat, and impact terrestrial ecological systems?

With the goals and focused determination by those types of people driving the green agenda, solar geoengineering is quickly becoming accepted by the millions of people in the climate change cult. Too many have had their minds transformed by the unending climate agenda messaging, to the point where they are willing to take a gamble. Holly Jean Buck, a professor at the University at Buffalo, sums up the geoengineering mindset on behalf of the cult followers: “Can you not imagine someone in, say, 2050, who is suffering from extreme heat, wondering why their parents’ generation decided to forbid research on something that might be able to cool the climate and save them from a dangerous heat wave?”

This is a movement that must be stopped. If you haven’t already read Climate Cult, I hope you’ll listen to the podcast.

 

Facts In, Fear Out

For decades, federal environmental policy has been driven by a spirit of exaggerated fear put forth by radicals desiring to reshape the United States into some sort of fashionable Marxist society.

Their efforts often reminded me of an important life principal found in the Bible:  For God has not given us a spirit of fear and timidity, but of power, love, and self-discipline (2 Timothy 1:6).

The new Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Lee Zeldin, has announced major changes in environmental policy that will move us away from destructive alarmism and into solid science. For example, the EPA seeks to:

  • End the federal policies mandating subsidized electric vehicles, which were set to cost the taxpayer over $1 Trillion.
  • Eliminate the do-nothing Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program which costs us hundreds of millions of dollars each year and does nothing to improve air quality.
  • Prevent catastrophic wildfires by allowing prescribed burns to reduce the amount of fuel in the forests that can allow a small fire to become monstrous.
  • Revise ridiculous rules that interpret small rural ditches and seasonal backyard ponds as sensitive eco-systems that must be protected from use or disturbance.

These four examples are just the start of a scientific sanity campaign put forth by a White House administration that applies facts, not fear, and returns Power to the People.

And, speaking of the facts, please purchase a copy of my latest book, “Climate Cult: Exposing and Defeating Their War on Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Six Ridiculous Examples Illustrating Why USAID Should be Shuttered

PLEASE NOTE: This is not meant to be a humorous post.

In 2023, its own words, USAID stated, “through the Agency’s flagship ‘Clean Cities, Blue Ocean’ program under the ‘Save our Seas Initiative,’ is responding to the ocean plastic pollution crisis by working with its partner countries in Asia, the Pacific Islands, Latin America and the Caribbean to address these challenges to provide the tools and resources so that women can successfully participate in and advance local circular economies.”

Note the last twelve words: “so that women can successfully participate in and advance local circular economies.”

So how is USAID making way for Clean Cities, Blue Oceans, and Saving our Seas?

These are six word-for-word examples, according to USAID:

  1. Creating opportunities for women to establish and expand their waste businesses.
  2.  Including gender in the local government planning processes.
  3. Promoting the safety of women in waste.
  4. Strengthening women’s agency and confidence to be recycling champions.
  5. Designing waste system solutions based on gender-inclusive research.
  6. Rightsizing technology and facilities for women

For fiscal year 2024 alone, the Biden Administration budgeted $53 million for this project.

Not a Natural Disaster: The Los Angeles Fires

Both the Mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, and the Governor of California, Gavin Newsom, are blaming the horrific fires in Southern California human-induced climate change. This is a bogus mantra designed to cover for the gross dereliction of duty employed by a myriad of elected officials at all levels of government in the Golden State.

As mentioned in my last post, the incredibly high winds experienced in Southern California were accurately forecast by the National Weather Service several days before they began. These winds are seasonal, blowing east to west, down the slopes of the nearby mountain ranges and towards the Pacific. As the winds rush down the mountainside, they manifest warm and extremely dry air. This is NOT a feature of so-called climate change. It’s a weather condition that has been around forever.

At this point in time, the only suspected and known cause for these fires is arson.

Now, let me diverge for a moment and speak to a subject I wrote about in my 2012 bestseller, Eco-Tyranny (WND Books).

In 2005, the FBI stated that America’s number one domestic terror threat was eco-terrorism. At that time the concern was focused on two radical environmental organizations, Earth Liberation Front and EarthFirst. Why should we think that such terror concerns would have evaporated since 2005?

In large measure, the leadership of these eco-radical orgs has been able to curry favor with liberal elected leaders and bureaucrats to see their goals accomplished within the construct of government. This is all easily accomplished through the doctrine of Sustainable Development.

Created by the United Nations in the 1983, Sustainable Development requires, as Al Gore has stated, “a wrenching transformation of society.” It seeks the near elimination of fossil fuels, the shuttering of all nuclear power plants, the tearing down of dams (they are declared “unnatural”), and—perhaps more germane to the situation in Los Angeles—moving the population from single family residential housing to stack-and-pack complexes in “Fifteen Minute Cities.”

Driving this Sustainable mentality is something also created by the UN: Social Equity.

Social Equity is not DEI. It declares that all species are equal. In other words, humans are no more important than termites. This is one of the reasons why farmers in the California’s Central Valley (one of the richest agricultural valleys in the world) can no longer get the water they need from the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta. The environmentalists claim that using the water for crops endangers a 3-inch-long fish known as the Delta Smelt. Thousands of acres of farms have gone to weeds as a result of the delta water pouring out to sea.

Social equity also accused the homes on the Malibu coast of endangering the nests of the California Least Tern.

Also, I discovered this from a friend who is a municipal water consultant in California regarding that empty reservoir in Pacific Palisades that was supposed to be under repair: normally such maintenance takes thirty or fewer days. Instead, this critical reservoir had been bone-dry for the past TEN months. Perhaps Sustainable Development is why the elected officials and desk-jockeys in LA County decided it wasn’t a critical piece of infrastructure?

California is the wealthiest state in the nation. It possesses the highest overall tax base. It has the most restrictive environmental rules and regulations. It’s also a one-party state dominated by elected officials who have more in common with Marx than Madison.

You can blame this entire disaster on authoritarian office holders and monolithic public officials, all of whom are overpaid and promised a hefty pension to boot.

And, perhaps the arsonists are radical environmentalists.

Hope you’ll read my newest book, Climate Cult.  Just Click Here.

Thank you!