Brian Sussman Climategate

The Climate Hustle

My friend Marc Morano, has released a fantastic film: The Climate Hustle, Part Two.

Marc is also the publisher of tremendous website dedicated to debunking global warming (ClimateDepot.com). I’m recommending this film to you, not because I am in it, but because it will arm you with the truth to better understand the battle the USA faces against these aggressive, lying, hypocritical climate alarmists who desire socialism (and eventually communism).

Let me give you an example of what I’m referring to.

The World Economic Forum met in June 2020. At that gathering some of the planet’s most powerful leaders called for a “Great Reset” of the entire global economy. They clearly want to stamp out capitalism worldwide and go to socialism.   Of course, to do that they are using their favorite go-to: climate change alarmism.

After all, their most effective way to get what they want is to convincingly sell their plans by scaring an uninformed populace. These world leaders realize that average working folks have neither the time nor are able to make sense of the tons of scientific research papers on the subject. That’s because the climate is very complex, an ever-changing system with many inputs involving hundreds of factors.

Additionally, these rhetorical magicians will never mention the countless experts, including professors, hurricane experts, weather satellite gurus, and even the keepers of the global temperature, who vehemently disagree with their schemes.

And then there is the hypocrisy.

Like previous climate summits, the World Economic Forum events are lavish parties attended by celebrities, deep-pocketed business people and politicians, mostly flying in on private jets while having a feel-good time trying to convince everybody the world is about to end.

Meanwhile, climate realists are getting the facts out to the public and educating them along with exposing all the fraud behind climate change alarmism.           Here are just a few recent examples of how things have been changing for the better lately.

Michael Shellenberger, a 20-year former climate activist states: “On behalf of environmentalists, I Apologize For The Climate Scare”.

Good for him.

Then there’s the European Extinction Rebellion’s spokeswoman Zion Lights, who quit the climate scare movement to instead campaign for the benefits of nuclear power. She feels she was duped by the intentions of the movement.

 And lastly, there’s Michael Moore—the co-founder of Green Peace. He left the organization he co-founded some years ago after it was hijacked by socialists. He has a movie out entitled “Planet of the Humans,” in which he exposes the green-energy myths.

And then there’s the recent Gallup Poll taken between July 1 thru July 23, 2020. It revealed “Climate Change/Environment/Pollution” was near the bottom of the most important problems in the U.S.

Hooray!

Here’s the real deal: we red, white and blue Americans love our freedom, independence, and standard of living and are not willing to give it up for something as ridiculous as phony climate change. It’s just isn’t going to happen. We’re capable of taking care of ourselves, which goes against the mindset of the left.

As for the film, Climate Hustle 2, make sure you get two copies, one for yourself, and another to give away. It stars Kevin Sorbo and features yours truly. Just get on your computer and type in ClimateHustle2.com for details.

God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

Hit Me Twice: YouTube’s Thought Police are at it again

Several years ago, WND Books published my two best-sellers on global warming, “Climategate: A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam” (2008) and “Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda Will Dismantle America” (2010).

Both books are filled with hundreds of footnotes detailing peer-reviewed scientific studies illustrating why one should, at the least, be skeptical of human-caused global warming claims.

Interestingly, “Climategate” and “Eco-Tyranny” also clearly tie the roots of the green movement to a host of influential leftists, beginning with Marx and Lenin.

Last week I posted a tongue-in-cheek video on YouTube, for an ongoing series called, “The Epic Story of the Day.” In this particular video, subtitled, “Global Warming,” I read a vivid description of incredibly warm conditions in the Arctic Circle and a prediction of worse to come. I concluded my comments by comically mentioning that the article I was reading was originally published, word-for-word, by the Washington Post – in 1922!

Within an hour of posting the humorous piece, YouTube’s speech police stationed this dictatorial warning directly below the video box:

“Global warming is a long-term rise in the average temperature of the Earth’s climate system, an aspect of climate change shown by temperature measurements and by multiple effects of the warming.”

The disclaimer, which is primarily seen by those using a desktop computer, included a link to Wikipedia declaring anthropogenic global warming to be fact.

Unreal. To think that YouTube’s almighty speech police rely on Wikipedia as its purveyor of truth.

What a joke. Last I checked, the bio Wikipedia displays about me is brimming with blunders.

This is chilling. YouTube (a subsidiary of Google) is likely the largest media content provider in the world. By all accounts, its board of directors and corporate officers lean (way) left. At what point will a decision be made to add disclaimers to videos involving the Ten Commandments, the deity of Jesus, or biblically based morality and family values?

No question, YouTube is in the censorship business. As a private enterprise they are able to get away with it because they are not subject to a government entity like, for example, the Federal Communications Commission, which oversees broadcast radio and television.

In fact, in a 2018 court case involving Prager University, a nonprofit run by conservative radio talk-show host Dennis Prager, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said the organization had failed to show that YouTube infringed its free speech rights by placing restrictions on its content.

The plaintiff, Prager University, said YouTube’s “animus” toward its “political identity and viewpoint” led it to curb access to videos, including through its “Restricted Mode” setting, on such topics as abortion, gun rights, Islam and terrorism, despite its stated promise of neutrality.

The judge said YouTube did not qualify as state actor subject to the First Amendment by creating a “public forum” for speech.

“Defendants are private entities who created their own video-sharing social media website and make decisions about whether and how to regulate content that has been uploaded on that website,” Koh wrote. “Plaintiff has not shown that defendants have engaged in one of the very few public functions that were traditionally exclusively reserved to the state,” she added.

My recommendation? When posting conservative truth, thought and opinion on YouTube, follow the words of Jesus: “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore, be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves” (Matthew 10:16).