• Skip to main content
  • Home
  • About Brian
  • The Podcast
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Books
    • Climate Cult – NEW!
    • ClimateGate
    • Eco-Tyranny
  • Contact
Brian Sussman

PODCAST

BLOG

Rumble

climate scam

Are Climate Lockdowns Next?

This article was originally posted at American Thinker…

We all vividly recall the absurd COVID lockdowns. While they had no effect on the spread of illness, the imposed regulations certainly proved that a large segment of the population was easily compelled to come to heel and submit to the government’s outrageous demands.

Since the COVID scare worked so well for the left, could a climate lockdown be next?

Given the facts I provide in my new book, Climate Cult: Exposing and Defeating Their War on Life, Liberty, and Property, such a scheme should come as no surprise, especially given that the Biden administration and Congressional Democrats are priming the pump with talk of executive action to declare a “climate emergency.”

As I reveal in the book, the first individuals to contend the environment was in peril due to human behavior were direct disciples of Karl Marx. Their contempt for capitalism and private property motivated them to conjure up a fallacious argument: the earth’s ecosystem was being mutilated by the industrial revolution. In fact, Edwin Ray Lankester, a zoologist at University College, London and close friend of Marx, referred to humanity as “the insurgent sons of nature.” Even Vladimir Lenin—a radical environmental preservationist—wrote lengthy regulations placing Russia’s natural resources off limits to his subjects. Millions died of starvation and hypothermia as a result.

In more recent decades, the climate agenda has been crafted by the United Nations with the United States and many European nations rushing to comply. It was a 1987 UN document entitled, Our Common Future, that officially introduced CO2 as not only the cause of global warming but a threat to world peace and an agent of economic inequality. Since then, the elitists at the World Economic Forum have provided muscle for the United Nation’s plans. In fact, a man the WEF describes as an agenda contributor, Yuval Noah Harari, pompously declared, “You can stop all flights, you can lockdown entire countries,” to combat climate change.

Climate lockdowns have been discussed by Democrats for several years. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced the Climate Emergency Act of 2021, co-sponsored by 62 congressional Democrats. The bill would “require the President to declare a national climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act, and for other purposes.” Allowing President Biden to declare a climate emergency would provide the him with statutory powers that could be renewed should he gain a second term. The proposed Act reads like a communist takeover, demanding a “radically and socially just” plan to increase union membership, guarantee wages and benefits, promote social and environmental justice, expand the rainbow flag, and transition America to a carbon-free economy.

Last July, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, told reporters, “The president is going to do everything he can to take action. This climate emergency [decision] is not going to happen tomorrow but we still have it on the table.”

Eco-zealot Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), told Politico that he urged Biden to use emergency authority to enact radical climate change measures.  “In the absence of congressional action it is critically important he use all of his powers.”

And, of course, working in tandem with the Democrats on Capitol Hill, the UN has its own Climate Emergency webpage which states, “The science is clear. The world is in a state of climate emergency, and we need to shift into emergency gear.”

Yes, the science is clear. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a requirement for life on Earth, and more is better. As for global warming, the geological record indicates past periods have been significantly warmer than today.

Given that CO2 represents .04 percent of all atmospheric gases and of that amount only four percent are derived from fossil fuels, we should all be reminded that the tail doesn’t wag the dog.

World’s Foremost Hurricane Expert Reveals the Climate Hoax

Dr. Neil Frank is the former Director of the National Hurricane Center and the world foremost expert on hurricanes. He’s always been a professional hero of mine (he’s 92-years young), and a couple months ago I literally prayed, “Lord, is there a way for Dr. Frank to read the manuscript for my book? I’d love to get his endorsement.”

Lo and behold, I was able to get the manuscript to Dr. Frank, and he did endorse it, with great enthusiasm I might add!

This week on my podcast, I present part one of my recent interview Dr. Frank. He describes how, in the Eighties, he initially trusted the cadre of scientists who were tooting the horn on global warming, but never researched any of their claims for himself as he was busy forecasting the biggest storms on earth. However, at the behest of a colleague, he did eventually dig into the details and was astounded by the sloppy conclusions of the global warming crowd.

In this episode of the Brian Sussman Show (EP 229, video version below) you’ll meet Dr. Frank and witness his passion as he shares that the claims from the climate change activists, especially regarding hurricanes, are not founded in reality.

ON THE AIR LIVE TODAY – “Marc Morano Unleashed!”

Can’t wait to be on the air, live, with the great Marc Morano, publisher of ClimateDepot.com.

Marc is the most prolific author to debunk the climate change/global warming narrative. He’s also produced some fantastic films on the subject in that of the Climate Hustle movies (in which I appear).

I’ll be on his show today at 10AM Pacific/1PM Eastern. You can watch the program via this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOOsm8D-J_g

Warning: this interview today may cause members of the climate cult to experience manifestations of psychological deliverance.

The Angry Mind of Michael Mann

Most of you don’t know Michael Mann, but you may know someone a lot like him. As I will illustrate, he is a very angry, extremely liberal guy, who, despite his PhD, relishes in bombastic and deceitful claims.

Michael Mann was also a principal figure in a number-crunching performance that eliminated the significance of something referred to as The Medieval Warm Period (MWP). By essentially erasing the record of this extended cycle of warmth on planet earth, which ran from about 950 to 1350AD, Mann was able to allow climate influencers like Al Gore claim, “The earth has a fever.”

I wrote extensively about this in my book, Climategate (2010). Mann’s subterfuge coincided with a leak of emails from the Climate Research Unit in East Anglia (CRU). The emails strongly suggest that there was a well-concerted effort to manipulate data in order to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.

In my upcoming book, Climate Cult, I make a very strong case to reveal how the activists pushing the climate agenda, which includes professors of atmospheric science—like Mann—possess a moral compass whereby the ends justify the means. In other words, they will do and say whatever it takes to defeat and destroy their enemy.

And who is their adversary? As I prove in the book, it’s much bigger than Big Oil or even capitalism. Their enemy are the inalienable (God-given) rights of life, liberty, and property ownership. Their champion is Marxism. While they may never consider themselves communists or socialists, they do admire the label, “progressive” (which is a more acceptable version of the same), and certainly believe the United States of America needs a complete reset in the name of a new era of government-aided social justice and equity—an  envisioned new age where winners and losers will be chosen by the levers of state and societal per pressure.

And, by the way, in their envisioned new world there is no room for objectors or naysayers.

So, if you’re a guy like Michael Mann, why not use your professional pulpit to manipulate data to fit your agenda? Why not scare the world into believing carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant that is destroying the planet. If this is about a new world order, then why not pull out all the stops?

Clearly illustrating my position, here are some very recent Tweets from Mann, who appears to be very angry as we turn into the new year).

January 3, repost:
You can’t negotiate with evil. You must defeat and destroy it.

January 2:
The American right is engaged in open war on democracy and decency, in close collaboration with Russia and an affiliated network of fascist & authoritarian regimes. They are a threat to you and all that is dear to you. You can destroy them at the ballot box this year.

January 2 repost:
If election deniers are elected we kill the USA.

January 2 repost:
I love it when trolls reply to my tweets. I hide their comment so nobody sees it, while lowering their twitter rating by muting, blocking (and often reporting) them. It’s one the small pleasures in life.

January 2;
The American right is engaged in open war on democracy and decency, in close collaboration with Russia and an affiliated network of fascist & authoritarian regimes. They are a threat to you and all that is dear to you. You can destroy them at the ballot box this year.

Added to that post: Let’s just say it. They are pure evil.

January 2 repost:
As we begin 2024, an election year, let’s remember that Donald Trump’s response to Covid led to the avoidable deaths of hundreds of thousands of our neighbors, friends, relatives, and fellow citizens.

January 2 repost:
You could cite hundreds of examples of this kind of thing, but one I frequently think about is “Climategate.” Right wing shitheads stole a bunch of emails from a climate research org, sifted through them, plucked sentences, phrases, and even individual words out of context

January 2 repost:
Trump and his followers are domestic terrorists and must be treated as such

January 2 repost:
And yes, there is empirical, peer-reviewed support for the conclusion that climate deniers, in general, are truly awful human beings:

January 2 repost:
“The obstacles to climate action are neither physical nor technological. At this point, they remain political.”

January 1:
“2023 was Earth’s hottest year, potentially warmest in 125,000 years”
(Brian here, See my blog post on this: https://www.briansussman.com/commentary/biggest-climate-lie-of-2023/ ).

December 31:
“And so, it is 100% clear that there is this toxic package or bundle of right-wing ideology, nationalism, exceptionalism, racism, sexism, anti-immigrantism, and anti-climate-change that goes with it. That is what drives many of them”.

Dec 30 repost:
climate deniers (and the trollbot armies they employ) are a danger to society. block them, mute them & report them (a triple whammy for their account rating). Don’t engage with them.

December 30:
Ignorant narcissistic climate science denier (Trump) promotes slick science denialist (Morano)

You see, this is really asymmetrical warfare. It includes scientists, educators, influencers, celebrities, politicians, deep state actors, world leaders, corporations, and very wealthy. I actually pray for guys like Mann. That they will come to know the Truth, and allow the Truth to set them free (John 8:32).

The Climate Change Coffee Spoof Video

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is essential for life. We humans, as well as the animal kingdom, exhale it. Plants absorb it. Dead and decaying organic matter of all types emits CO2. Carbon dioxide is also one of the many greenhouse gases that assures our climate is habitable. Without those gases the difference between night and day temperatures would swing 100 degrees!

Carbon dioxide is a finite compound, in other words there is only some much of it. It is constantly cycling from places where it is stored, into the atmosphere that surrounds Earth, and back into the oceans, as well as into all life forms, and then back into the cycle again. Despite its prominence, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is a mere four-hundredths of a percent (.04%).  Even more miniscule is percentage of that carbon dioxide that is produced by human activity: 4%.

As I explain with some vivid analogies in my upcoming book, Climate Cult, 4% of .04% is infinitesimal. There is no way fossil fuels (which emit CO2 when used) could throw the planet’s temperature and climate out of whack.

In my most recent video I illustrate the folly of those who contend we must reduce our personal carbon footprint and put an end to “Big Oil.” If gasoline and diesel are bad, what about coffee? The flavor one enjoys from their favorite coffee beverage comes from the roasting of the beans which exude CO2 when properly heated. Humans consume billions of cups of coffee each day—that’s a lot of carbon dioxide from those cups of joe! When are the environmentalists going to go after “Big Coffee?”

And therein lays my spoof. Enjoy and share.

And Happy New Year!

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Go to Next Page »
Brian Sussman
Rumble
Brian Sussman

About Brian

Husband, Dad, Patriot, Hall of Fame Broadcaster, Certified Meteorologist, and follower of "The Great I Am.

More about Brian...

Email Newsletter

Sign up for our e-newsletter for latest events and news.

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Subscribe
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

© 2023 Brian Sussman. All Rights Reserved. Site Map.

Website by Consistent Image Web Design