messianic news

Shedding light on the Dark Web, Cryptocurrency, and why Facebook wants a piece of this huge market – Hidden Headlines Podcast

This podcast will totally educate you.  The Dark Web is much larger, and scarier, than the web you and I surf.  It’s like the Devil’s Bazaar. Anything you could ever imagine is there for observation, discussion, and purchase.

But what about the currency used on this villainous platform?  The moola of choice is known as cryptocurrency–and it’s pretty easy to obtain.

This week Facebook was on Capital Hill being quizzed about their entrance into the cryptocurrency marketplace.  Why in the world would they want to be a part of that sphere, and why should we trust them?  After all, this is the same company who’s founder suggested that all the people who provide him with their personal information are “dumb fucks.”

You’ll definitely want to share this edition of Hidden Headlines, available on this website, Soundcloud, iTunes, GooglePlay, or Spotify, Thursday June 18.

 

The Radical Muslim Congresswoman and Her Blatant Lies About Israel

Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib has made yet another shocking and ignorant claim: thinking about the Holocaust gives her a “calming feeling” because her Palestinian ancestors provided a “safe haven” for Jewish victims of the tragedy.

On a podcast she said,

“There’s always kind of a calming feeling I tell folks when I think of the Holocaust, and the tragedy of the Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors — Palestinians — who lost their land and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways, have been wiped out, and some people’s passports. And just all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post-the Holocaust, post-the tragedy and the horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time. And I love the fact that it was my ancestors that provided that, right, in many ways. But they did it in a way that took their human dignity away and it was forced on them.”

What an idiot. Her last line reveals her twisted heart: apparently her “ancestors” (meaning her Islamist cousins) were somehow “forced” to behave in a benevolent fashion towards the persecuted Jews.

Besides that, she is purposely avoiding the historical facts:

  • The Jewish presence in the area currently known as Israel dates back thousands of years, and the modern migration of Jews to Israel pre-dated the Holocaust by many decades (1880s).
  • The Balfour Declaration of 1917, (drafted by the British government) supported the establishment of a Jewish state in the area, an idea rejected by Arabs.
  • In 1937, the British Peel Commission proposed a two-state solution to Jews and Arabs, which the Arabs again rejected.
  • During World War II, the supreme Palestinian leader, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Muhammad Amin al-Husayni, met with Adolf Hitler and allied with the Nazis, recruiting young men of Islamic faith for service in German military.
  • After World War II, when the Jewish people declared the state of Israel, their official proclamation stated, “We appeal – in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months – to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions.” Arab leaders responded by encouraging Arabs to immediately flee Israel, and the next day, Israel was invaded by Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq.

Tlaib’s claims are void of ANY truth.

Nancy Pelosi should censor this fanatic, if not, any Jew (or authentic Christian) who continues to vote Democratic is committing political suicide.

Another Gruesome Abortion Bill Moving Forward in California

Earlier this week, pro-life leaders testified in the California Senate against a bill that would require all public universities in California to provide abortion pills to its students, for free.

The proposed law would mandate that California public universities provide students with RU-486, a drug used in first trimester abortions.  The drug works by blocking a hormone called progesterone that ensures the mother’s uterus thickens and allows a newly-created human to develop. Without that hormone, the uterine lining is shed and the human being subsequently dies.

This is why some call this gruesome drug, “The Toilet Seat Abortion Pill.”

The California Senate Education Committee held a hearing where advocates and critics of the bill were able to testify in favor of or against it.  At that hearing, Students for Life of America, a major campus pro-life organization, called upon California legislators to vote against the proposed law.

Kristan Hawkins, the President of Students for Life of America, flew to Sacramento to testify against the bill.  In her testimony, Hawkins cited a recent FDA report stating that in the past 20 years, 24 women have died from the abortion procedure this bill would force public universities to provide.

“Are California’s schools prepared to handle the repercussions of students experiencing possibly life-ending bleeding and infections, caused by the abortion pills the school is providing?” Hawkins asked during the hearing.

Hawkins also noted that SB-24 could pose an issue for the conscience rights of students and university employees.

“Given that the both UC and CSU health programs are funded through student fees, it is not just possible but likely students will ultimately be paying for their classmates’ abortions. Further, no provision has been made in the proposal to protect the conscience rights of students or health center personnel, who don’t want to fund or support toilet seat abortions, ending human life on college and university campuses,” she said.

Both chambers of the California state legislature passed a bill nearly identical to SB-24 last year, but Gov. Jerry Brown surprisingly vetoed it. Brown stated the bill was “not necessary” because most universities are located near abortion clinics.  California Democrats are hedging their bets that newly elected Gov. Newsom will sign the revived bill into law.

The Democrats have strong majorities in both chambers of the state legislature, likely guaranteeing that the bill will end up on Newsom’s desk.

 

37 Executions in Saudi Arabia, home of “the religion of peace”

If you believe in freedom of speech, then I hope you will listen to the argument I am presenting.

The news from Saudi Arabia today is that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman ordered the execution of 37 citizens.  Like all executions in “the kingdom” they were publicly conducted beheadings, though one of the victims was crudely crucified.  Several of the dead bodies were raised high by cranes for the people to better behold.

Executions in Islam’s holiest state have increased notably in recent years.  So-called “crimes” worthy of such an end include homosexuality, sorcery, and reading the Bible.

This is the real “religion of peace.”

To say I’m an Islamophobe is not listening to my argument.

Saudi Arabia is synonymous with Islam.  In fact the kingdom is called “home of Islam.”  Two of the religion’s holiest cities, Mecca and Medina are there; the latter where the Islam’s founder, Mohammad, lived and died.  Every years millions of faithful Muslims attend the Hajj pilgrimage in Mecca, an event that is a must for every Muslim in the world to attend at least once.

The government of Saudi Arabia is run not by a constitution, but by the Koran.  Women are second-class citizens in Saudi Arabia.  Non-Muslims are as well. Violate a jot or tittle and you’ll be brutally beaten.  Commit a bigger sin and off with your head.

I personally think it’s disgusting to know that our government is friendly with Saudi Arabia and many U.S. corporations do business there.

I also think it’s stupid to call this cult the religion of peace.

Georgia’s Heartbeat Bill, Stacey Abrams, and the Lies of the Pro-Abortion Democrats

Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?” Genesis 3:1

We should never be surprised when pro-abortionists use crafty rhetoric to trick people into believing that good is evil and evil is good.  Such is the case with yet another liberal democrat politician.

Sunday on MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” 2018 Georgia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams said the Georgia “fetal heartbeat” bill, that would ban abortion as soon as a doctor can detect a fetal heartbeat, was “evil.”

While discussing a potential Hollywood filming boycott in Georgia should the bill becomes law, Abrams said, “We have to be a state that is not only friendly to businesses we have to be friendly to the women who work in businesses. You should not have to worry about you ability to controlling your bodily autonomy because the governor has pushed such an abominable and evil bill that is so restrictive. It’s not only bad for morality and our humanity, it’s bad for business.”

Abrams, who lost her bid for governor to pro-life Republican Brian Kemp, criticized pro-life lawmakers and the heartbeat bill during a rally in Dalton, Georgia, according to the Times Free Press.

“HB 481 is evil, and it exists because it was a campaign promise. It exists because it was a political stunt,” Abrams said.

Georgia House Bill 481, the Living Infants Fairness and Equality (L.I.F.E.) Act, would ban abortions on an unborn baby after their heartbeat is detectable, around six weeks. It would allow exceptions for rape, incest and threats to the mother’s life. In addition, the bill would allow parents to claim unborn babies as dependents on their taxes and include the unborn baby in census data. It also would allow mothers to collect child support for pregnancy and delivery costs from the father prior to the baby’s birth.

It passed a final vote Friday in the House, and now is headed to the governor’s desk for his signature.

“It is dangerous,” Abrams told reporters. “I think it is scientifically insupportable. I know it will cause harm to women, especially to those women who face the highest rate of maternal mortality already. We know that we will lose doctors. We will lose jobs. And I believe it is purely a craven exercise designed to fulfill a political promise.”

What Abrams meant by “scientifically insupportable” is not clear, but it’s generally medically accepted that an unborn baby’s heart is beating by six weeks of pregnancy, though research by the University of Oxford suggests the heartbeat may begin as early as 16 days after conception.

Abrams’ claims that the bill “is dangerous” is ridiculous.  She ignores the fact that the bill would protect human lives by banning abortions.  In fact, if enforced, the legislation would end almost all abortions in Georgia and save countless unborn babies’ lives. Legalized abortion also does nothing to help prevent maternal mortality.

And now the Hollywood liberals–a group of characters both filthy rich and filthy immoral–are stomping their collective feet like snot-nosed pre-schoolers who didn’t get their way: they’re threatening  a massive protest to boycott the state and take their millions in movie and television productions with them.

In March, a federal judge blocked Kentucky’s new heartbeat bill. In January, a judge also declared Iowa’s heartbeat law unconstitutional. North Dakota and Arkansas passed heartbeat bills several years ago, but federal courts struck down their laws as well.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals said the following about its ruling on the six-week abortion ban: “Because there is no genuine dispute that (North Dakota’s law) generally prohibits abortions before viability — as the Supreme Court has defined that concept — and because we are bound by Supreme Court precedent holding that states may not prohibit pre-viability abortions, we must affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the plaintiffs.”

There is more hope that the U.S. Supreme Court may consider an abortion ban, but it is difficult to say if it would for certain – especially after Chief Justice John Roberts recently sided with the liberal justices on an abortion case.